He is the general editor of the gospel project, and the author of multiple books, including this is our time, eschatological discipleship. It was not his own penalty that he bore, but he was a substitute for others, for those who would be joined to him by faith. Pdf, epub, and kindle files will be sent to this email address. Packer the task which i have set myself in this lecture is to focus and explicate a belief which, by and large, is a distinguishing mark of the wordwide evangelical fraternity. A lot of leaders who reject penal substitution will say that it was invented by calvin or anselm and that the early church held to christus victor or ransom theories of the atonement.
Craig truglia 8 comments in a previous article i pointed out how jerome, cyril of alexandria, and athanasius all described the atonement similar to terms used by calvin. Penal substitutionary atonement is a theory which attempts to explain the meaning and purpose of christs death, how jesus death saves and what it means for the world. Medical substitutionary atonement in irenaeus of lyons. This compilation of hodges articles served as a useful resource for reformed churchesthen and nowand creates a deepened understanding of the atonement.
They added a more legal or forensic framework into this notion of the cross as satisfaction. Penal substitutionary atonement is the view that christ was a legal substitute for us on the cross and that he bore the penalty for our sins that is due to us. Tltwatwd represents, instead, the patristic ransom theory insofar as it is the white witch who is paid off, not the emperor over the sea. The doctrine of the atonement one consuming passion. Here were none of the distortions and childish lisping id been ready to expect from exponents of this theology.
Penal substitution is the doctrine that jesu s suffered on b ehalf o f sinners the death, punish men t, and curse due to fallen humanity as the penalty for sin. Defending penal substitutionary atonement evidence unseen. Church history penal substitutionary atonement the gospel. Jul 29, 2016 what is even more devastating for the antipst view than the historical evidence in church history is a careful exegesis of the text of scripture. Jan 02, 2020 so, penal substitution is the act of a person taking the punishment for someone elses offenses. Penal substitutionary atonement is no mere logical construct, nor a monstrous degradation of the character of god. Instead, they held what i am calling medical substitution, which is an aspect and in my opinion, the foundation of the christus victor understanding. The task which i have set myself in this lecture is to focus and explicate a belief which, by and large, is a distinguishing mark of the wordwide evangelical fraternity. Christ paid the price that the law demands, a blood sacrifice for atonement, but sin warrants eternal death of which he did not pay. Im not a theologian myself, so you wont get 10,000 smart words from me on this subject, although i understand the atonement to be about propitiation not mere expiation. Martin luther on atonement and penal substitution guard. It has seldom been given to any writer to work such a change in the history of thought as that wrought by. Penal substitution is a theory of the atonement within christian theology, which argues that.
I use it because the web is in the public domain not ed. Critics of penal substitutionary atonement state that seeing the atonement as appeasing god is a pagan idea that makes god seem tyrannical. Our friend ben holloway, an evangelical theologian in the making, and one that seems to have been disturbed enough by my article on the heresy of penal substitution as to take me to task on his blog, misses the really core issue of the nature of our redemption, which is from death, not from the anger or justice of the father. Penal substitution by greg bahnsen calvinist view the judicial and substitutionary nature of salvation by greg bahnsen alma and anselm.
Penal substitution in church history 201 3millard erickson, christi an theology grand rapids. This book s approach to the atonement is that of a word study, comparable to that of kittels theological dictionary of the new testament. In other words, i dont have a problem with penal substitutionary atonement. This is indeed the charge that is sometimes leveled against the argument that penal substitution is an essential element of a biblical view of the atonement. God imputed the guilt of our sins to christ, and he, in our place, bore the punishment that we deserve. Penal substitution in perspective mcmaster university. Why i have changed my mind about penal substitution i was brought up in the kind of evangelical church that drummed into us as children that jesus died to save us from our sins. The governmental view says christs atonement is a substitute for our penalty. The real history of penal substitutionary atonement youtube. The wikipedia article on penal substitution states in its opening paragraph penal substitution sometimes, esp. Since ones belief about the atonement is bound up with ones belief.
Penal substitutionary atonement has been the most difficult subject i have written on. In christian theology, jesus christ is the substitute, and the punishment he took at the cross was ours, based on our sin 1 peter 2. Penal substitutionary atonement refers to the doctrine that christ died on the cross as a substitute for sinners. Pdf penal substitutionary atonement in the early church fathers. Articulating, defending, and proclaiming christ our substitute. The first half of the book presents the case for penal substitution from key biblical texts, as well as how the doctrine fits together with other major bible doctrines. My personal view is that there is a role for penal substitution in the overall prism of atonement theology, but i think elevating penal substitution as the central reality or truth of the. Jul 23, 2017 this new view of substitutionary atonement emphasized punishment over satisfaction and paralleled criminal law. Orthodox christians on penal substitutionary atonement. He absorbed in his person gods righteous wrath against us, because of our sin, that we might be free from sin and its penalty and liberated to enjoy such a person forever. Of all the atonement theologies, only penal substitution best captures the godcentered nature of the cross. Pdf the present disposition of atonement theology has been turbulent in. Substitutionary atonement center for action and contemplation.
Atheist richard dawkins describes the atonement as vicious, sadomasochistic and repellent. It is argued that a theology of penal substitution without christus victor. Why i have changed my mind about penal substitution union. Unless otherwise noted, all bible verses are from the world english bible web. He absorbed in his person gods righteous wrath against us, because of. The doctrine of penal substitutionary atonement the idea that god punished jesus on good friday in our placedivides christians. Southern baptist convention on the necessity of penal. Feb 22, 2017 tom wright explains why we shouldnt separate christus victor and penal substitution views of the atonement from each other or the rest of the gospels. In 1931, a theologian named gustav aulen published a book about the atonement called christus victor, a book that challenged the historic doctrine of atonement sometimes called penal substitution or the. How does penal substitution relate to other atonement.
Jul 08, 2017 our friend ben holloway, an evangelical theologian in the making, and one that seems to have been disturbed enough by my article on the heresy of penal substitution as to take me to task on his blog, misses the really core issue of the nature of our redemption, which is from death, not from the anger or justice of the father. Substitutionary atonement, also called vicarious atonement, is the idea that jesus died for us, as propagated by the classic and objective paradigms of atonement in christianity, which regard jesus as dying as a substitute for others, instead of them. Penal substitutionary atonement theory best explains the holiness of god in relationship to the legal requirements of the punishment of sin. The new atheists speak of christs atonement with the most derisive of language. Mar 21, 2011 is the penal substitutionary understanding of the atonement a novel idea held mainly by the reformers and their theological offspring. Craig truglia 50 comments john calvin wrote that jesus christ was made a substitute and a surety in the place of transgressors and even submitted as a criminal, to sustain and suffer all the punishment which would have been inflicted on them.
Part 2 why i deny penal substitutionary atonement by matt ferdelman penal substitutionary atonement psa is a theory of how god saves humanity. The book to end penal substitutionary atonement stephen. Then comes practical implications, as well as a historic survey of the doctrine. Resolved, that the messengers to the southern baptist convention meeting in phoenix, arizona, june 14, 2017, reaffirm the truthfulness, efficacy, and beauty of the biblical doctrine of penal substitutionary atonement as the burning core of the gospel message and the only hope of a fallen race. Mar 22, 2016 so substitution is not a theory of the atonement. A related practical advantage of the christus victor view of the atonement is that, in sharp contrast to the hyperindividualistic outlook of most americans, the christus victor model puts on center stage the easilyoverlooked demonic dimension of all fallen social structures. Its a theory which i have argued against openly and often, ive written extensively against it in my book we belong. Who first clearly formulated the penal substitution theory of. The controversy is over whether the church of the first thousand years taught penal substitution, so this time period will be the foc us. Penalsubstitutionary atonement in church history reformed. Packer in knowing god, first published in 1973, designates a distinct difference between pagan and christian propitiation. Historical reflections on substitutionary atonement fuller. Eq substitutionary atonement and the church fathers.
On this view christ apparently receives his due, but god is robbed of his honour. Nothing more is needed than scripture itself to offer a sound and thorough refutation of any view opposing a penal substitutionary atonement. C s lewis had a defective view of salvation and was an opponent of the substitutionary and penal view of the atonement. The entire storyline of scripture, the history of redemption, is the story of god providing substitutes for his. Why i have changed my mind about penal substitution. It is rather the essence of each image and the heart of the atonement itself. What is the penal substitutionary atonement theory. So, penal substitution is the act of a person taking the punishment for someone elses offenses. Introduction one of the most significant claims of the recent book pierced for our transgressions by steve jeffery, michael ovey, and andrew sach,1 is that the doctrine of. Penal substitution as a theory of atonement in the early. The reformers, specifically calvin and luther, took anselms satisfaction theory and modified it slightly. Satisfaction theory in the book of mormon a detailed overview of anselms satisfaction theory of atonement with a comparison to book of mormon theology. It argues that christ, by his own sacrificial choice, was punished penalised in the place of sinners substitution, thus satisfying the demands of justice so god can justly forgive the sins.
Penal substitution was a way of talking about the cross with which i was. Penal substitutionary atonement is a development of the reformation. He didnt take our exact and literal penalty eternal hell but provided a. Such troubling statements as a denial of penal substitution is a denial of christianity itself, either proves that no one was ever saved before calvinism, or that those that would make such ridiculously stupid claims are arrogantly ignorant of christian history, without love for their christian brothers, or incompetent expounders of the word. Penal substitutionary atonement he was pierced for our transgressions. You can read more about the book including reading a free. If asked what jesus came to do and how he did it, most contemporary western christians would automatically say something like, jesus took the punishment from god that i deserved. Atonement, patristics, church fathers, early church, penal substitution, substitutionary atonement, christus victor, restorative justice. Who first clearly formulated the penal substitution theory. In his view, gods offended honor and dignity could only be satisfied by the sacrifice of the godman, jesus christ. But can the historical evidence bear the weight of.
According to the doctrine of penal substitution, gods perfect justice demands some form of atonement for. This we call penal substitutionary atonement jesus reconciled sinners to god by being their substitute punishment. In particular, the book offers background to the current debates about penal substitutionary atonement by looking at that idea in biblical and historical. The earliest book in the time frame in which we are interested, recovering the scandal of the cross by joel green and mark baker, began the third millennium. I do find both penal and substitutionary elements in a jesuscentered reading of scripture on the subject of atonement. If you have ever doubted penal substitution, but then thought, what about isaiah 53. There is an elegance and a brilliance to belouseks argument, and i have not doubt that this book will be the end of penal substitutionary atonement for anyone who reads itand hopefully for the evangelical church as a whole. Throughout my 63 years as an evangelical believer, the penal substitutionary understand. Penal substitution revisited new hope presbyterian church. Atonement and penal substitution in the bible and history, has one central thesis. In contrast, penal substitution is a legitimate and relevant representation of the. Thus, penal substitution is an invalid theory, and therefore, we are not standing on burnt ground. A history of the christian doctrine of justification. In this book stephen holmes offers an accessible and authoritative account of the way the saving work of jesus is presented in the bible, and has been understood throughout christian history.
Vlach assistant professor of theology recently, at least since t he ei ghteent hcent ury l iber ali sm gained a plac e in pro testant ism, the penalsubstitution view of christs atonement has come under attack. The biblical doctrine of penal substitutionary atonement is the most assailed, most controversial, and most assured result of recent work on the cross. The cross of jesus was the centre of the message at summer camps, holiday bible clubs, and youth group talks. In paganism, man propitiates his gods, and religion becomes a form. Nor is it even an additional image to take its place as an option alongside the others. Mar 26, 20 greg boyd outlines the penal substitution view of atonement and some of the problems this view creates. Few doctrines are more beautiful than penal substitution. The doctrine of atonement download ebook pdf, epub. Penal means legal as in penal colony jesus was made under the law galatians 4. M claren, the story we find ourselv es in furt her advent ures of a new kind of christi an. It doesnt get any more personal christianity today. Where christus victor, for example, is a wonderful model to describe cosmic redemption, substitutionary atonement is about my salvation. Wright denies penal substitution trevin wax april 24, 2007. Of all the models of atonement, it best reflects the personal god of the bible, in his loving creation of.
This theory is also known as the vicarious atonement for christ. Pdf a theological and biblical examination on the synthesis of. This book covers the words redemption, covenant, blood, propitiation. This would address david roxas concern that penal substitutionary atonement is incompatible with theosis salvation as participation with the uncreated energies of god. For all the bluster id read about penal substitution being a late arrival to the atonement theory party, i was surprised to read in ancient writers some very plain expositions of the doctrine. The penal view says that christ is our substitute in penalty. Here the notable presence of atonement synthesis is highlighted throughout church history. Christus victor understanding the cross from the perspective of grace rather than legalism derek flood this 4 part article has now been made into the book. Scripture portrays the saviors death as the basis of every spiritual blessing rom 8. This series touches the surface of 2,000 years of complex theological process.
In my opinion, leon morris is the best christian author on the cross of all time. Click download or read online button to get the doctrine of atonement book now. Jun 27, 2017 the most concerning issues i have with psa are not the penal and substitutionary aspects, but the propitiatory and satisfactional elements within the classic reformed view of psa. Nov 26, 2015 in a previous article i pointed out how jerome, cyril of alexandria, and athanasius all described the atonement similar to terms used by calvin john calvin wrote that jesus christ was made a substitute and a surety in the place of transgressors and even submitted as a criminal, to sustain and suffer all the punishment which would have been inflicted on them institutes 2. It argues that christ, by his own sacrificial choice, was punished penalised in the place of sinners substitution, thus satisfying the. The atonement began as a series of articles on the atonement which appeared in the presbyterian banner intended to correct the broad misrepresentation of the doctrine of the atonement. Substitutionary atonement and the church fathers eq 143 transgressions, it would be important first to define what precisely is meant by penal substitution. In many ways, the death of jesus christ on the cross stands at the heart of the christian faith. This personal dynamic is what gives substitutionary atonement such homiletic force, and why it is a staple of evangelical preaching, teaching, and devotion. God imputed the guilt of our sins to christ, and he, in.
Every atonement view stresses something biblical about the cross. When i think about the penal substitutionary atonement, i think of the story, the lion, the witch and the wardrobe. Penal substitution evangelical theological society. He previously taught church history at morling college, and is an adjunct faculty. Is it true that many believe a doctrine of the atonement that began. The book to end penal substitutionary atonement stephen d. In it, he explores the relationship between penal substitutionary atonement psa. Historical reflections on substitutionary atonement.
I find this interesting as lewis famously denied the penal substitution doctrine. Penal substitution theory according to this view sin, which is primarily a violation of gods law, not his honor, results in the just penalty of death. Today, the phrase substitutionary atonement is often correctly or incorrectly used to refer to the penal theory of atonement. This book is the finest defense of penal substitution available. But in love jesus christ, our substitute, in his life perfectly. An initial distinction that must be made is between the general idea of substitutionary atonement and the more specific notion of penal substitution. This site is like a library, use search box in the widget to get ebook that you want. The heresy of penal substitution the morning offering. Try searching on jstor for other items related to this book. The satisfaction or commercial theory of the atonement was formulated by the medieval theologian anselm of canterbury 10331109 in his book, cur deus homo lit.
Jun 03, 2015 penal substitution as a theory of atonement in the early church fathers date. For the story of psa is the story of the passionate expression of gods love. I have a problem with propitiatory satisfactional atonement. Penal substitution simply means that jesus died to bear the penalty for my sins, hence penal, and. But unlike penal substitution, they fail to grasp the central problem that the cross remedies, namely our sin before god. The doctrine of the atonement introduction christianity is all about christ, and the crucial fact about christ is his passion on the cross.
They were not advocates of the penal substitutionary atonement theory. It seeks to explain 1 what problem god came to solve, 2 how the problem was solved, and 3 to what end goal god saves us. After all, the climax of my book jesus and the victory of godis the longest ever demonstration, in modern times at least, that jesus selfunderstanding as he went to the cross. Stephen sykes, the story of the atonement dlt 1997. The substitutionary atonement of jesus christ on the cross. Various atonement theologies emphasize many biblical truths and entailments of the cross.
1209 1578 1225 908 893 801 716 1287 1498 560 939 427 1549 560 1667 1580 941 625 1383 474 1376 1168 833 655 319 1031 207 114 156 969 700 482